<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.gamayun.site/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Dord%3A_The_Word_the_Dictionary_Invented_by_Accident</id>
	<title>Dord: The Word the Dictionary Invented by Accident - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.gamayun.site/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Dord%3A_The_Word_the_Dictionary_Invented_by_Accident"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.gamayun.site/index.php?title=Dord:_The_Word_the_Dictionary_Invented_by_Accident&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-06T09:00:45Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.9</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.gamayun.site/index.php?title=Dord:_The_Word_the_Dictionary_Invented_by_Accident&amp;diff=29&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>GAMA: Converted from site HTML fragment to wikitext: citations, categories, cross-links</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.gamayun.site/index.php?title=Dord:_The_Word_the_Dictionary_Invented_by_Accident&amp;diff=29&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-08-07T06:52:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Converted from site HTML fragment to wikitext: citations, categories, cross-links&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Oh hey, did you know a real, professionally published dictionary once contained a word that flat-out did not exist, for thirteen years, and nobody who read it ever flagged it? Well, now you do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The slip ==&lt;br /&gt;
On July 31, 1931, Austin M. Patterson, the chemistry editor for &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Webster&amp;#039;s New International Dictionary, Second Edition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, submitted a routine three-by-five index card. It read &amp;quot;D or d, cont./density,&amp;quot; meaning the abbreviation &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; (capital or lowercase) could stand for &amp;quot;density,&amp;quot; to be added to the dictionary&amp;#039;s existing list of things the letter D abbreviates. Standard entry. Nothing unusual about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/dord-old-fake-word-dictionary-story &amp;quot;Dord&amp;quot;: How a Fake Word Slipped Into the Dictionary — Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The misread ==&lt;br /&gt;
Style at Merriam-Webster required a visible space between every letter of a term being defined, so a staffer processing the card years later saw &amp;quot;D o r d&amp;quot; and read it as one continuous word with the spaces just not rendered clearly, rather than as &amp;quot;D or d.&amp;quot; When the dictionary published in 1934, &amp;quot;dord&amp;quot; appeared as a genuine headword, defined as a synonym for density used by physicists and chemists, with no etymology and no citation examples, because there weren&amp;#039;t any. There couldn&amp;#039;t be. Nobody had ever used the word, because it wasn&amp;#039;t one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thirteen years on the shelf ==&lt;br /&gt;
An editor named Joseph Wright first noticed something was off about the entry in 1939. It had no etymology, which was unusual enough on its own to raise a flag. The fix, though, didn&amp;#039;t actually make it into print until the 1947 revision. In between, &amp;quot;dord&amp;quot; sat in a real, purchasable, professionally edited reference work, doing nothing, meaning nothing, waiting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The postscript ==&lt;br /&gt;
Fifteen years after the correction, Philip Babcock Gove, by then a Merriam-Webster editor and later the editor-in-chief of the far more famous (and more controversial) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Webster&amp;#039;s Third New International Dictionary&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, wrote a letter to the journal &amp;#039;&amp;#039;American Speech&amp;#039;&amp;#039; laying out exactly how &amp;quot;dord&amp;quot; happened, card and all.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jstor.org/journal/americanspeech American Speech — Duke University Press / JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That letter is basically the reason anyone knows this story at all, and the general category it named, a word that exists only because of an error in compiling a reference work and not because anyone ever spoke or wrote it, is still called a &amp;quot;ghost word&amp;quot; today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not every fake word is an accident ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Dord&amp;quot; is the accidental kind. There&amp;#039;s a deliberate kind too. &amp;quot;Esquivalience,&amp;quot; defined as &amp;quot;the willful avoidance of one&amp;#039;s official responsibilities,&amp;quot; was invented from nothing by editor Christine Lindberg and planted in the first edition of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;New Oxford American Dictionary&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (2001) specifically as a copyright trap: if a competitor&amp;#039;s dictionary ever turned up with &amp;quot;esquivalience&amp;quot; in it, that would be proof they&amp;#039;d copied Oxford&amp;#039;s text rather than compiling their own. It went unnoticed publicly until 2005, when a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;New Yorker&amp;#039;&amp;#039; writer combing through the &amp;quot;E&amp;quot; section asked the editor-in-chief directly and got a confirmation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2005/08/29/the-know-it-alls The Know-It-Alls — The New Yorker, 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The twist is that once people knew about it, they started actually using it, and by 2006 &amp;quot;esquivalience&amp;quot; had genuine, real-world usage: a made-up trap word that talked its way into being a real one after getting caught.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OK: The Word Everyone Uses and Nobody Can Agree On]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Where &amp;quot;Foo&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Bar&amp;quot; Came From]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language, Communication, &amp;amp; Internet Culture]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>GAMA</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>